14 Days Free — What You'll See in Your First 5 Meetings

Your first analysis takes 5-15 minutes to run depending on the recording length, then drops you into the OutputPage with a full report. Most people scroll straight to the per-speaker remarks because that's where the surprise lives — a behavioural observation about you, written by an AI that just listened to you talk for half an hour, that catches a pattern you hadn't put into words.

The behavioural summary at the top is a 10-15 bullet group- dynamics observation. It's almost always slightly different from what you'd have written about the meeting yourself — that gap is the signal that the analysis is doing real work and not just paraphrasing the transcript. You'll probably also scroll through the critical moments looking for the one where the conversation tipped. Most users replay Meeting 1 at least twice.

By the second analysis, the layout starts feeling familiar but the content is genuinely different. You'll notice whether the observation from Meeting 1 was a one-off or a recurring pattern in how you communicate. Both answers are useful — a recurring pattern is something you can work on; a one-off is confidence that not every analysis will hammer the same note.

The coaching journal begins to form here. After Meeting 2, the cross-meeting layer has just enough data to start synthesising — usually a sentence or two about what shifted between the first and second analyses. Speaker review also starts feeling natural; the AI gets your speaker patterns calibrated faster than you'd expect, so by Meeting 2 you're correcting fewer names.

Three meetings is the threshold where most users have a "holy shit" moment — the specific moment varies by use case. For sales reps, it's often a buyer-intent signal that surfaces in the analysis that they remember noticing in the call but couldn't quite articulate. For consultants, it's often a per-stakeholder dynamic observation that names something they had a vague feeling about. For founders practising pitches, it's often a delivery pattern (over-explaining, rushing past objections) that the self-coaching mode flags consistently across rehearsals.

The coaching summary by Meeting 3 starts producing genuinely compounding output. You see "what's recurring" alongside "what's shifting." The cross-meeting view becomes more valuable than any single meeting's analysis.

By the fourth meeting, you're calibrated to how the analysis thinks. You start trusting the behavioural observations faster — less scrolling, more reading. The critical-moment extraction usually aligns with your gut read of the meeting in roughly 80% of cases.

The remaining 20% is where the real learning lives. Either the analysis caught a moment you hadn't noticed (in which case it's teaching you something about your own attention), or you disagree with how the analysis read a moment (in which case it's sharpening your own judgment by giving you something to argue with). Both are valuable. People often start changing how they prepare for the next meeting based on what's repeatedly appearing in their analyses.

Five meetings is where you have enough data to make a decision about whether the tool is worth keeping. The coaching journal is rich enough to be useful as a standalone artifact. The per-speaker remarks have enough density that you can flip between meetings and trace your own communication patterns. The critical-moments archive is becoming searchable in your own head.

Most users either extend the trial (because they want to see the longer-arc coaching synthesis develop) or upgrade to a paid plan around this point. Some don't, and that's fine — the 14-day window is genuinely meant to let you decide based on your own conversations rather than our marketing copy. We'd rather lose users for whom the depth isn't useful than convert users who'll churn after a month.

Seven days isn't enough. Most professionals run 5-15 meetings in a week, but the cross-meeting compounding doesn't fully emerge until you have variation across meeting types. A week of all sales calls won't show you the value the way a week with a mix of sales, internal, customer-success, and one-on- ones will.

Two weeks captures that variation in a typical professional's calendar. You should see both recurring patterns (your default meeting style, which is what coaching needs to work on) and one-off outliers (specific moments that taught you something in the moment, which is what critical-moment extraction is for). If after 14 days the analysis hasn't shown you something you didn't already know about your own communication, the tool isn't a fit for your situation — and that's fair. We'd rather you find out in the trial than two months in.